Spring Break
A scientific compromise
Ectogenesis may satisfy a long debate
By: Midhat Farooqi
Issue date: 9/30/03 Section: Opinion
Still, the issue of ectogenesis is not as well-known as that of abortion, which has been infamous from the beginning. On one side are the pro-life supporters who believe that a fertilized human egg is a complete human being that has the same rights and privileges as, say, a 35-year-old brain surgeon. On the other side are the pro-choice supporters, who feel that an egg is not a viable human being, but a mass of cells dependent on a woman's body. Hence, a woman has the right to remove these cells from her body. This is a woman's private decision; so, the potential loss of a productive human life need not concern the public.
Enter ectogenesis.
Now, an unwanted fetus, rather than being aborted, is removed from a woman and placed in an ectogenetic chamber. The fetus is then raised in a laboratory under the supervision of reproductive scientists. Then, the baby is "born" and adopted by a loving family.
No abortion takes place, appeasing pro-life groups, while the woman still decides if she wants to be pregnant, satisfying the pro-choice supporters. The fetus, too, fares better. It develops into a child in a much safer environment, one where medical assistance is never far away and there is less risk of alcohol exposure or bodily injury.
Skeptics may ask who will provide the money to raise the fetus by ectogenesis. As all technology, the price for such a procedure would be high initially, but, in a matter of time, decrease dramatically. Once ectogenesis becomes routine it may even be equal to, or lower than, the cost of the abortion a woman was originally seeking.
So, instead of a woman paying for an abortion, she can instead foot the bill for ectogenesis.
What's more, the sundry of pro-life organizations should put their money where their mouth is and help financially support women seeking ectogenesis. Pro-choice groups should not object to ectogenesis either, and should help chip in.
Indeed, the amount of resources that both groups spend fighting one another would probably be better served supporting ectogenesis: at least, actual progress will be made.
To date, ectogenesis is the only idea where pro-life and pro-choice groups can find common ground. Thus, it gives both the chance to transcend the brutal abortion war, rather than fighting it to no end. Both sides should realize this and finally make amends.
Enter ectogenesis.
Now, an unwanted fetus, rather than being aborted, is removed from a woman and placed in an ectogenetic chamber. The fetus is then raised in a laboratory under the supervision of reproductive scientists. Then, the baby is "born" and adopted by a loving family.
No abortion takes place, appeasing pro-life groups, while the woman still decides if she wants to be pregnant, satisfying the pro-choice supporters. The fetus, too, fares better. It develops into a child in a much safer environment, one where medical assistance is never far away and there is less risk of alcohol exposure or bodily injury.
Skeptics may ask who will provide the money to raise the fetus by ectogenesis. As all technology, the price for such a procedure would be high initially, but, in a matter of time, decrease dramatically. Once ectogenesis becomes routine it may even be equal to, or lower than, the cost of the abortion a woman was originally seeking.
So, instead of a woman paying for an abortion, she can instead foot the bill for ectogenesis.
What's more, the sundry of pro-life organizations should put their money where their mouth is and help financially support women seeking ectogenesis. Pro-choice groups should not object to ectogenesis either, and should help chip in.
Indeed, the amount of resources that both groups spend fighting one another would probably be better served supporting ectogenesis: at least, actual progress will be made.
To date, ectogenesis is the only idea where pro-life and pro-choice groups can find common ground. Thus, it gives both the chance to transcend the brutal abortion war, rather than fighting it to no end. Both sides should realize this and finally make amends.
Be sure to include your name, major, and class year. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.
By submitting a comment, you agree to thebatt.com's Terms of Use.
You may also send a Mail Call to The Battalion at mailcall@thebatt.com