Children left behind
Disadvantaged students are overlooked by President Bush's education plan
By: Adam Scharn
Issue date: 2/8/05 Section: Opinion
|
Perhaps President George W. Bush's greatest masterpiece in social reform is the No Child Left Behind Act, or at least he seems to see it as such. Bush's interest in public education reform is commendable, but he fails to see the contradiction in his concept and his means to the end.
The principle of the act was to bring the quality of public education "up-to-code" in every district across the nation. However, the methods and loopholes within the bill actually bypass the problem altogether and weaken the chances disadvantaged students have to receive an education of the highest quality.
In other words, the No Child Left Behind Act actually leaves children behind. Several debates have sprung over different problems of the bill, but one has yet to be fully exposed or discussed: the special education exemption.
The mechanics of the act require that all states issue standardized tests to their public schools, such as the TAKS (formerly known as TAAS). The scores of these tests are used to evaluate the effectiveness of each school and the improvement of the students to determine, among other things, the apportionment of federal dollars, according to the Texas Education Agency. Unfortunately, so much emphasis has been put on these tests that states have lost sight of their role and purpose in educating the future of America.
In addition to the state curricula, public educators also must teach the standardized test material, which includes giving practice exams. Teachers use these practice exams to determine their students' strengths and weaknesses. However, according to Chris McCormack, Special Education Facilitator for Killeen Independent School District, when a teacher feels a student has repeatedly scored at sub-par levels, the teacher will insist on testing the child to see if he qualifies for special education services.
"If a child is eligible to be served in special education, the student can be exempted in Texas and other states and take an alternative series of tests," McCormack said.
Pushing students into special education for the sole purpose of state test exemption has not produced a single positive outcome. Perhaps doing so will keep a particular school off of the government's "bad list," but that is not what should really matter.
Spring Break







Be sure to include your name, major, and class year. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.
By submitting a comment, you agree to thebatt.com's Terms of Use.
You may also send a Mail Call to The Battalion at mailcall@thebatt.com