Quantcast The Battalion
College Media Network
  • ©2009 Student Media

A&M under investigation after disease transmission

By: Candace Birkelbach

Issue date: 4/24/07 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
The incident occurred when the researcher was cleaning a chamber that contained aerosolized brucella by climbing partially into it, which A&M officials said was inappropriate lab protocol. A&M officials later concluded that the brucella bacteria likely entered her body via her eyes as a result of this improper procedure.

Supervising was David McMurray, an A&M microbial and molecular pathogenesis professor and self-described inventor of the Madison Aerosol Chamber.

This is the third instance of lab-acquired infections related to the Madison chamber that the Sunshine Project has uncovered. Hammond said the others were in Seattle and New York City.

"These accidents do happen and are not uncommon at bio facilities," Moore said.

Hammond said the main concern with these types of incidents is the reporting procedure and that this is not only a problem at A&M.

"The biggest problem is that labs are subject to federal laws, which are flawed," Hammond said. "We need to change them so there is a single reporting requirement that makes sense, that universities and labs will actually obey, and we don't have that right now."

Hammond said this incident also shows how the federal government is encouraging labs to do more aggressive and risky research since Sept. 11.

Sunshine Project reported that more than 400 labs across the country are using bioweapons for research with about 20,000 people at those facilities.

"The two major facilities using bioweapon research in Texas are located at the UT Medical Branch in Galveston and the Southwest Foundation for Biomedical research in San Antonio," Hammond said. "A&M and UT have smaller levels of bioweapon research."

He said A&M is involved with multiple projects using brucella and also the bioweapon, "Q Fever," which is generally not lethal and may have been used in the Cuban Missile Crisis to weaken people.

Because A&M still has not released all the records he requested, Hammond said he filed a complaint with the attorney general in Austin and will be looking into why records are being withheld along with the CDC.

"Based on his assumptions, (Hammond) thinks A&M purposely covered this up, which I agree would cause great concern, but we just want same information out as the CDC," Moore said.
< prev Page 2 of 2

Article Tools


Give us your take on the story.
Be sure to include your name, major, and class year. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.

By submitting a comment, you agree to thebatt.com's Terms of Use.

You may also send a Mail Call to The Battalion at mailcall@thebatt.com


Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 9

Jackson

posted 4/24/07 @ 2:51 AM CST

You know what would have made reading this worthwhile. If it said what the RISK to students and faculty is RIGHT NOW. That should have been one of the first grafs. (Continued…)

Joe

posted 4/24/07 @ 8:35 AM CST

Jackson,

You don't think the fact that A&M is testing agents used in biological weapons, the fact that a researcher got injured, and the fact that A&M failed to report it for a whole year is not big enough news? What hole did you just crawl out of?

Darren

posted 4/24/07 @ 9:36 AM CST

The research conducted in the lab this incident occurred in has nothing to do with bioweapons. This fact was obviously omitted purposefully. This particular lab is located in the Vet school and the work pertains to brucella infection and resistance in CATTLE. (Continued…)

Caprice

posted 4/24/07 @ 11:16 AM CST

You don't think that here in Aggieland, where Aggies are supposed to not lie, cheat, or steal, that this is a big story? Officials LIED and covered up what was going on in the lab. (Continued…)

Joe

posted 4/24/07 @ 11:38 AM CST

Darren, if it had nothing to do with bioweapons, please explain why EVERY action taken with the use of brucella must be filed with the CDC under the 2002 Bioterrorism Act?
Again, the story is not about the fact that the person infected posed or didn't pose a threat, the story is about A&M NOT FILING THE REPORT FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR! If you don't think that's a big story, then you sir are covering the facts and writing the fiction, not The Batt. (Continued…)

gig'em

posted 4/24/07 @ 12:07 PM CST

Why did the researcher not report the infection for 2 months? It sounds like A&M is not the only one at fault for not reporting the incident.

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Darren

posted 4/24/07 @ 3:35 PM CST

The person with the brucella infection found out about a week after. The appropriate department on campus was notified. Was there a concerted effort to hide that fact? Possibly. (Continued…)

Bill

posted 4/25/07 @ 5:04 PM CST

Darren:

Why do you say that the person with the brucella infection "found out about a week later"?

From what I have read about this, the accident happened in February 2006 and the diagnosis was made in April 2006. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

In Today's Print

 

Just In (AP Lead Stories)

Advertisement

  • Podcasts
  • Videos