Quantcast The Battalion
College Media Network
  • ©2009 Student Media

A&M under investigation after disease transmission

By: Candace Birkelbach

Issue date: 4/24/07 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
Media Credit: Chris Griffin
[Click to enlarge]
Texas A&M is being investigated after failing to timely report to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that a student researcher was infected with brucellosis in 2006.

Brucellosis is an infectious disease caused by the bacteria brucella, which is typically transmitted by animals. The student was accidentally infected while cleaning a chamber used to infect mice with aerosolized brucella for research purposes on Feb. 9, 2006. The researcher told A&M officials of the brucellosis diagnosis on April 10 or 11, 2006.

The Select Agent Rule, a regulation to implement the 2002 Bioterrorism Act, requires incidents such as that to be reported to the CDC within seven days, said Edward Hammond, project director of watchdog group Sunshine Project.

Sunshine Project, a group investigating this incident, reported the required APHIS/CDC form was filed April 11, 2007, a year after the incident. A&M may be fined $500,000, plus up to $250,000 for individual(s) that failed to report the incident, and criminal charges could also be filed, Hammond said.

CDC officials confirmed the ongoing investigation, but said there did not appear to be any current health threat.

David Prior, executive vice president and provost for A&M, released a statement stating that the event had been confirmed by an internal investigation and noted the person involved had recovered following treatment.

"We have since strengthened our safety, training and reporting procedures following the human error involved in not reporting this incident," Prior said in the statement. "We will be fully cooperative, and our goal is to comply with all current biosafety standards."

CDC officials were on campus to conduct an independent review of A&M's policies and procedures, Prior said in the statement.

No more statements will be released until A&M receives the final report from the CDC, which they expect to have later this week, said Steve Moore, vice president for communications and chief marketing officer for A&M.

"We want to have the same information out as the CDC, and once we receive their final report, A&M will issue an official response," Moore said.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools


Give us your take on the story.
Be sure to include your name, major, and class year. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.

By submitting a comment, you agree to thebatt.com's Terms of Use.

You may also send a Mail Call to The Battalion at mailcall@thebatt.com


Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 9

Jackson

posted 4/24/07 @ 2:51 AM CST

You know what would have made reading this worthwhile. If it said what the RISK to students and faculty is RIGHT NOW. That should have been one of the first grafs. (Continued…)

Joe

posted 4/24/07 @ 8:35 AM CST

Jackson,

You don't think the fact that A&M is testing agents used in biological weapons, the fact that a researcher got injured, and the fact that A&M failed to report it for a whole year is not big enough news? What hole did you just crawl out of?

Darren

posted 4/24/07 @ 9:36 AM CST

The research conducted in the lab this incident occurred in has nothing to do with bioweapons. This fact was obviously omitted purposefully. This particular lab is located in the Vet school and the work pertains to brucella infection and resistance in CATTLE. (Continued…)

Caprice

posted 4/24/07 @ 11:16 AM CST

You don't think that here in Aggieland, where Aggies are supposed to not lie, cheat, or steal, that this is a big story? Officials LIED and covered up what was going on in the lab. (Continued…)

Joe

posted 4/24/07 @ 11:38 AM CST

Darren, if it had nothing to do with bioweapons, please explain why EVERY action taken with the use of brucella must be filed with the CDC under the 2002 Bioterrorism Act?
Again, the story is not about the fact that the person infected posed or didn't pose a threat, the story is about A&M NOT FILING THE REPORT FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR! If you don't think that's a big story, then you sir are covering the facts and writing the fiction, not The Batt. (Continued…)

gig'em

posted 4/24/07 @ 12:07 PM CST

Why did the researcher not report the infection for 2 months? It sounds like A&M is not the only one at fault for not reporting the incident.

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Darren

posted 4/24/07 @ 3:35 PM CST

The person with the brucella infection found out about a week after. The appropriate department on campus was notified. Was there a concerted effort to hide that fact? Possibly. (Continued…)

Bill

posted 4/25/07 @ 5:04 PM CST

Darren:

Why do you say that the person with the brucella infection "found out about a week later"?

From what I have read about this, the accident happened in February 2006 and the diagnosis was made in April 2006. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

In Today's Print

 

Just In (AP Lead Stories)

Advertisement

  • Podcasts
  • Videos