Quantcast The Battalion
College Media Network
  • ©2009 Student Media

Changes on the way

Department unanimously endorses climate report

By: Kristin Leveille

Issue date: 7/10/07 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
"I think it is significant because as far as I know, we are the first department to release a statement," Orville said.

Gerald North, distinguished professor in atmospheric sciences, said one reason for the release of the statement was because he kept getting questions about the validity of global warming.

"I had a number of well-educated people in the Texas Legislature and from different boards and committees who would doubt global warming," North said. "It's not because they are stupid, it is because they don't know what to believe."

North said this should be a strong statement to people outside the scientific community and said there is absolutely no debate within the geosciences community about the realities of global warming.

Because the atmospheric sciences department does research, which is paid for by the federal and state government, Andrew Dessler, an associate professor of climate science, said they have an obligation to return their expert opinions to the public.

"Since climate change is something that is in the news so much and because many of the arguments revolve around science we felt it was our obligation to provide the A&M community and state with our expert opinion about what the scientific facts are."

In the past decade, the global warming debate has taken center stage as a mainstream issue both within the scientific community and the politics of Washington, D.C. Global warming is a controversial topic for many, with moral and economic arguments on both sides of the partisan divide.

Dessler said this issue is simply politically controversial and that the attacks on the science behind global warming misrepresent the state of science.

"Our goal with this statement was to remove the argument that there is no scientific consensus," Dessler said. "The debate should be moved to where it needs to be now, which is: there is a risk out there and what should be done about it. The risk clearly exists."
< prev Page 2 of 4 next >

Article Tools


Give us your take on the story.
Be sure to include your name, major, and class year. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.

By submitting a comment, you agree to thebatt.com's Terms of Use.

You may also send a Mail Call to The Battalion at mailcall@thebatt.com


Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 17

Don Bullock '57

posted 7/10/07 @ 5:33 AM CST

The kicker here is in the second paragraph where the word 'virtually' is, disclaimer like, inserted before the word 'certain'. We may be warming, but the earth has been warming and cooling in cycles for millenia. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

TomT

Tom Theimer

posted 7/10/07 @ 7:25 AM CST

Don ! YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT !! The department has not done their homework...or they are afraid to speak out against what has been popularized and thus losing countless dollars in future government funds. (Continued…)

Anonymous

posted 7/10/07 @ 7:46 AM CST

You guys couldn't be more wrong. While top scientists, experts, from all over the world continue to realize the reality and the gravity of this problem, you morons continue to give idiot politicians here an excuse to not do anything about it. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

A. Brannon Kroll '01

posted 7/10/07 @ 9:02 AM CST

Don and Tom,

I couldn't agree with you more. It is all about getting those almighty research dollars and federal grants. They are willing to sell their soles to the devil in order to keep the federal gravy train rolling. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Jordan Michel

posted 7/10/07 @ 10:09 AM CST

When is the last time you heard a scientist say they were certain about anything? They don't! Scientists come up with the best explanation they can given everything they know and always leave room to reevaluate their position in the future. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Robert Jacobson

posted 7/10/07 @ 4:06 PM CST

It is truly bizarre that so many people are so ready to believe in a conspiracy theory involving THE ENTIRE DEPARTMENT here at A&M. Essentially the argument (displayed by the commenters above) is that we cannot trust the very people who are charged with studying this problem scientifically, that is, we should not listen to climate scientists. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Jane Bailey

posted 3/10/09 @ 12:46 PM CST

I thank you for the opportunity to share a portion of my moments in time with future generations.

Caroline Pellyn

posted 3/11/09 @ 4:17 AM CST

Thank you for writing the article, I am very pleased with how it came out.

Dawn Redden

posted 3/12/09 @ 6:21 AM CST

Cheers for writing about this. FYI - here's some more info about watch bones you might like!

Eric '91

Eric '91

posted 3/12/09 @ 3:22 PM CST

Oh and one more thing, at this point we have a problem that needs a solution not mindless ideology. Even if it is a completely natural phenomenon, we still need to spend money on dealing with the chaos it will create. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

In Today's Print

 

Just In (AP Lead Stories)

Advertisement

  • Podcasts
  • Videos