Quantcast The Battalion
College Media Network
  • ©2009 Student Media

Changes on the way

Department unanimously endorses climate report

By: Kristin Leveille

Issue date: 7/10/07 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
North said this is not a liberal or conservative issue, but pointed to talk show hosts and activists who turn the issue into a partisan one.

"I am not blaming either side, they are in the business of politics," North said. "Our business is to say what the scientific consensus is."

The IPCC report states the global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide have increased markedly as a result of human activities since 1750 and far exceed pre-industrial values, and the increase in carbon dioxide is due primarily to fossil fuel use and land change.

Some argue the IPCC report is a political document, edited by politicians before it was released, and influenced by members of participating governments. The IPCC is open to all members of the United Nations and WMO.

Dessler said he rejects the argument that the IPCC reports are significantly influenced by politicians.

"The IPCC reports are written by hundreds of scientists and reviewed by thousands of others," Dessler said. "Politicians have no control over the bulk of the report, and that's why the reports represent the best thinking of the scientific community on the important issues involving climate change."

Temperature increases of up to 5 degrees Celsius, changes in rainfall patterns, extreme weather events and the decrease in availability of water in certain places are what Dessler said will be the likely impact of global warming.

"A few degrees doesn't sound like a lot, but, for example, during the last ice age the earth was a few degrees cooler than it is today," Dessler said. "In general, people are adapted to living on a planet that has a certain climate, and that climate hasn't changed much in the past 10,000 years."

According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) 2005 State of the Climate Report, carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere increased from approximately 280 parts per million (ppm) in pre-industrial times to 379 ppm in 2005.
< prev Page 3 of 4 next >

Article Tools


Give us your take on the story.
Be sure to include your name, major, and class year. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.

By submitting a comment, you agree to thebatt.com's Terms of Use.

You may also send a Mail Call to The Battalion at mailcall@thebatt.com


Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 17

Don Bullock '57

posted 7/10/07 @ 5:33 AM CST

The kicker here is in the second paragraph where the word 'virtually' is, disclaimer like, inserted before the word 'certain'. We may be warming, but the earth has been warming and cooling in cycles for millenia. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

TomT

Tom Theimer

posted 7/10/07 @ 7:25 AM CST

Don ! YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT !! The department has not done their homework...or they are afraid to speak out against what has been popularized and thus losing countless dollars in future government funds. (Continued…)

Anonymous

posted 7/10/07 @ 7:46 AM CST

You guys couldn't be more wrong. While top scientists, experts, from all over the world continue to realize the reality and the gravity of this problem, you morons continue to give idiot politicians here an excuse to not do anything about it. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

A. Brannon Kroll '01

posted 7/10/07 @ 9:02 AM CST

Don and Tom,

I couldn't agree with you more. It is all about getting those almighty research dollars and federal grants. They are willing to sell their soles to the devil in order to keep the federal gravy train rolling. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Jordan Michel

posted 7/10/07 @ 10:09 AM CST

When is the last time you heard a scientist say they were certain about anything? They don't! Scientists come up with the best explanation they can given everything they know and always leave room to reevaluate their position in the future. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Robert Jacobson

posted 7/10/07 @ 4:06 PM CST

It is truly bizarre that so many people are so ready to believe in a conspiracy theory involving THE ENTIRE DEPARTMENT here at A&M. Essentially the argument (displayed by the commenters above) is that we cannot trust the very people who are charged with studying this problem scientifically, that is, we should not listen to climate scientists. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Jane Bailey

posted 3/10/09 @ 12:46 PM CST

I thank you for the opportunity to share a portion of my moments in time with future generations.

Caroline Pellyn

posted 3/11/09 @ 4:17 AM CST

Thank you for writing the article, I am very pleased with how it came out.

Dawn Redden

posted 3/12/09 @ 6:21 AM CST

Cheers for writing about this. FYI - here's some more info about watch bones you might like!

Eric '91

Eric '91

posted 3/12/09 @ 3:22 PM CST

Oh and one more thing, at this point we have a problem that needs a solution not mindless ideology. Even if it is a completely natural phenomenon, we still need to spend money on dealing with the chaos it will create. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

In Today's Print

 

Just In (AP Lead Stories)

Advertisement

  • Podcasts
  • Videos