Quantcast The Battalion
College Media Network
  • ©2009 Student Media

Student senators seek support for discrimination bill

In the hope of cultural unity, Student Government develops legislation for inclusive campus

By: Amanda Grosgebauer

Issue date: 2/20/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
Tyler Koch, senior speaker of the Senate, said during its time in the committee, representatives of groups that have historically been discriminated against were allowed to speak about the importance of the bill and why senators should support it.

Bryan was asked to bring dictionary, legal and social definitions of discrimination to share while changing wording in the bill, to hold less weight and responsibility, in order to meet the terms laid out by the senators opposed.

During the three-month period, many senators were e-mailed and asked to vote in favor of the bill. Few were asked by their constituents to vote against the bill. A division grew between senators in support of the bill and those who felt it was overloaded with verbiage and that a second, broader bill would be better, Koch said.

On Jan. 23, the bill was brought before the Senate for the final time. The vote ended with 17 in favor, 30 opposed and four abstained in an individual-voiced vote in which each senator had to declare their vote.

Former Student Senator Victor Guo, who represented The College of Geosciences, resigned from the Senate before the final vote in anticipation of its failure and said, "If this is something that Senate does not stand for, then it doesn't represent me."

Samantha Kropp resigned from her position for many reasons, "Most senators represent their own ideas or beliefs and don't go out and ask the opinion of the students in their caucus."

Kropp received e-mails from people in her college supporting the bill and voted in support of the bill because that is what her constituents asked her to do.

Bryan and supporters were unwilling to let the fight end with a failed bill, so for the first time in student government history, they enacted a clause that allows for a referendum vote to be opened to the students if 10 percent of the student body signs a petition within 10 days.

Supporters have been petitioning through Facebook groups and events, tabling every day in Rudder Plaza and visiting organizations to try to gain enough signatures before time runs out.
< prev Page 2 of 3 next >

Article Tools


Give us your take on the story.
Be sure to include your name, major, and class year. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.

By submitting a comment, you agree to thebatt.com's Terms of Use.

You may also send a Mail Call to The Battalion at mailcall@thebatt.com


Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 16

Marc

posted 2/20/08 @ 8:20 AM CST

"Open door policies is the only anti-discrimination bill that would be truly anti-discrimination."
How can a bill against discrimination truly be inclusive if it does not call for the immediate end of all college entrance requirements? The SAT and other admissions test could be considered to be culturally biased. (Continued…)

Reade Sitton

posted 2/20/08 @ 9:34 AM CST

Amen, Marc!

While we're "changing" (Obama's entire platform, if you were to ask his supporters, apparently), might we consider Marc's remarks a little more seriously?

Can we start with finding another "measurement" for human beings other than "dollars"?

And in the interim, set the "value" of human beings at $infinite?

Future Teacher

posted 2/20/08 @ 10:42 AM CST

Reade,

Actually if you had been listening to Senator Obama's stance on education you would see that he does not support standardized testing. So maybe you could make the change. (Continued…)

Victor

posted 2/20/08 @ 12:06 PM CST

Back to the issue at hand regarding the bill, the Student Senate should take a hard look at the problems faced by many students while at the Northgate Bar district. (Continued…)

Honestly....

posted 2/20/08 @ 12:07 PM CST

Is there nothing more important going on at A&M right now? Why should there be any kind of legislation instructing people how not to discriminate? What a huge waste of time and money. (Continued…)

Andrew

posted 2/20/08 @ 1:56 PM CST

This is a pretty silly proposal. What is the real objective here? Please tell me who is being discriminated against and how this will help? It seems to me that the only possible goal could be to silence people. (Continued…)

Sam

posted 2/21/08 @ 12:30 AM CST

Will discrimination of the unborn be added to this bill??

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

lizzyb1112

Elizabeth

posted 2/21/08 @ 1:14 AM CST

Andrew brings up a very good point. What is the real objective? Do people really think that by enacting this legislation that the feelings of discrimination will just magically go away? All it's going to do is put it on paper that we shouldn't say certain things or treat people a certain way, which I'm pretty sure the majority of the student body was taught in grade school. (Continued…)

Ed

posted 2/21/08 @ 10:39 AM CST

I've endured enough of slurs and threats to my life because of my race and nationality as an undergraduate here. For a second it looked like there was something resembling an open admission by the student body that whatever i endured was not right. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Adam

posted 2/21/08 @ 11:21 AM CST

Can we add police discrimination too. They only give me a ticket because I'm a college student with a nice car.

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

In Today's Print

 

Just In (AP Lead Stories)

Advertisement

  • Podcasts
  • Videos