Quantcast The Battalion
College Media Network
  • ©2009 Student Media

Student senators seek support for discrimination bill

In the hope of cultural unity, Student Government develops legislation for inclusive campus

By: Amanda Grosgebauer

Issue date: 2/20/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
A 10-day window was opened beginning 8:30 a.m., Feb. 8, to allow supporters of an anti-discrimination legislation in Student Senate to gather 4,700 signatures that would allow the legislation to be brought before the student body through a referendum. The window will close Friday morning.

Riley Bryan, a junior recreation, park and tourism sciences major and student senator for the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, drafted the bill and introduced it to Senate in the fall.

After seeking legal advice from professionals and researching anti-discrimination policies from other institutions in the Big 12, Pac 10 and Top 20 universities, Bryan said he structured the bill to best fit within the spirit of unity important to Texas A&M University. The University has policies and programs in place to discourage discrimination.

"[The policies] are not inclusive to all people and are sending mixed and confusing signals to individuals about who is protected under them since the current policies are different and not in complete congruency," the bill states.

The bill further states, "creating a single, more inclusive statement would create congruency among all documents and send one message, that Texas A&M University will not tolerate discrimination in any form."

Bryan's bill lists every type of discrimination to be prohibited: race, ethnicity, creed, color, citizenship, national or ethnic origin, pregnancy, religion or lack thereof, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, genetic information, socioeconomic status, parental status, marital status and military or veteran status.

"Discrimination will happen no matter what, but an inclusive list would create a foundation for the University to support individuals when discriminated against," Bryan said.

He said that by listing the specifics, no one will fall through the cracks.

After its introduction in the fall, the Senate tabled the bill for three months to be edited to meet the approval of senators who voted against it.
Page 1 of 3 next >

Article Tools


Give us your take on the story.
Be sure to include your name, major, and class year. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.

By submitting a comment, you agree to thebatt.com's Terms of Use.

You may also send a Mail Call to The Battalion at mailcall@thebatt.com


Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 16

Marc

posted 2/20/08 @ 8:20 AM CST

"Open door policies is the only anti-discrimination bill that would be truly anti-discrimination."
How can a bill against discrimination truly be inclusive if it does not call for the immediate end of all college entrance requirements? The SAT and other admissions test could be considered to be culturally biased. (Continued…)

Reade Sitton

posted 2/20/08 @ 9:34 AM CST

Amen, Marc!

While we're "changing" (Obama's entire platform, if you were to ask his supporters, apparently), might we consider Marc's remarks a little more seriously?

Can we start with finding another "measurement" for human beings other than "dollars"?

And in the interim, set the "value" of human beings at $infinite?

Future Teacher

posted 2/20/08 @ 10:42 AM CST

Reade,

Actually if you had been listening to Senator Obama's stance on education you would see that he does not support standardized testing. So maybe you could make the change. (Continued…)

Victor

posted 2/20/08 @ 12:06 PM CST

Back to the issue at hand regarding the bill, the Student Senate should take a hard look at the problems faced by many students while at the Northgate Bar district. (Continued…)

Honestly....

posted 2/20/08 @ 12:07 PM CST

Is there nothing more important going on at A&M right now? Why should there be any kind of legislation instructing people how not to discriminate? What a huge waste of time and money. (Continued…)

Andrew

posted 2/20/08 @ 1:56 PM CST

This is a pretty silly proposal. What is the real objective here? Please tell me who is being discriminated against and how this will help? It seems to me that the only possible goal could be to silence people. (Continued…)

Sam

posted 2/21/08 @ 12:30 AM CST

Will discrimination of the unborn be added to this bill??

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

lizzyb1112

Elizabeth

posted 2/21/08 @ 1:14 AM CST

Andrew brings up a very good point. What is the real objective? Do people really think that by enacting this legislation that the feelings of discrimination will just magically go away? All it's going to do is put it on paper that we shouldn't say certain things or treat people a certain way, which I'm pretty sure the majority of the student body was taught in grade school. (Continued…)

Ed

posted 2/21/08 @ 10:39 AM CST

I've endured enough of slurs and threats to my life because of my race and nationality as an undergraduate here. For a second it looked like there was something resembling an open admission by the student body that whatever i endured was not right. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Adam

posted 2/21/08 @ 11:21 AM CST

Can we add police discrimination too. They only give me a ticket because I'm a college student with a nice car.

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

In Today's Print

 

Just In (AP Lead Stories)

Advertisement

  • Podcasts
  • Videos