Spring Break
The great grading policy debate
Faculty Senate was right removing the rubric requirement distinguishing between "A" and "B" grades.
By: Kaitlyn Drinkwater
Issue date: 2/19/09 Section: Opinion
On May 12, 1997, the Faculty Senate approved minimum syllabus requirements for graduate and undergraduate classes. Sometime between then and now, a sentence appeared under the 'grading policies' section. It reads:
"If a portion of the grade involves qualitative or subjective judgments, include a rubric in the grading scheme that identifies what distinguishes 'A' work from 'B' work from 'C' work, etc."
The erroneous sentence has been removed; it was voted out at the Senate's Feb. 9 meeting. When, why and by whom the sentence was inserted will remain a mystery for now.
The more interesting question is if the policy really should have been removed. After going unnoticed for who knows how long, then being brought to the Senate's attention by a student with a grade appeal, the "new" policy excited many students. But, because few professors knew about the policy in time to make their syllabi this semester and it has now been removed, it won't help anyone.
Would it have helped anyone had it been enforced?
Personally, I'm not a big fan of the requirement. Writing is an inherently subjective discipline, and the elements that distinguish papers of various grades are ineffable, or at the very least take a couple years of English classes to understand. Attempting to distil it into a rubric is impossible and unfair to students.
To use the "real world" model that students are so fond of (e.g. "History is stupid; when am I ever going to need to know this in real life?")
An employer will give clear expectations and goals for each project or task in a workplace, like the individual description of what topics should be covered in each paper. Your boss will not give an itemized list of what it takes to get promoted to CEO, because the qualities that make someone a good leader and manager are both inherent and indescribable. There are easy ones like organization (which applies to papers too, by the way) but what about charisma or reliability or just It? How are you going to spell that out in black and white? The meanings of the words themselves are subjective.
"If a portion of the grade involves qualitative or subjective judgments, include a rubric in the grading scheme that identifies what distinguishes 'A' work from 'B' work from 'C' work, etc."
The erroneous sentence has been removed; it was voted out at the Senate's Feb. 9 meeting. When, why and by whom the sentence was inserted will remain a mystery for now.
The more interesting question is if the policy really should have been removed. After going unnoticed for who knows how long, then being brought to the Senate's attention by a student with a grade appeal, the "new" policy excited many students. But, because few professors knew about the policy in time to make their syllabi this semester and it has now been removed, it won't help anyone.
Would it have helped anyone had it been enforced?
Personally, I'm not a big fan of the requirement. Writing is an inherently subjective discipline, and the elements that distinguish papers of various grades are ineffable, or at the very least take a couple years of English classes to understand. Attempting to distil it into a rubric is impossible and unfair to students.
To use the "real world" model that students are so fond of (e.g. "History is stupid; when am I ever going to need to know this in real life?")
An employer will give clear expectations and goals for each project or task in a workplace, like the individual description of what topics should be covered in each paper. Your boss will not give an itemized list of what it takes to get promoted to CEO, because the qualities that make someone a good leader and manager are both inherent and indescribable. There are easy ones like organization (which applies to papers too, by the way) but what about charisma or reliability or just It? How are you going to spell that out in black and white? The meanings of the words themselves are subjective.
Be sure to include your name, major, and class year. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.
By submitting a comment, you agree to thebatt.com's Terms of Use.
You may also send a Mail Call to The Battalion at mailcall@thebatt.com