Quantcast The Battalion
College Media Network
  • ©2009 Student Media

MAILCALL

By: Justin Schwartzbeck

Issue date: 2/20/09 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
In response to "Right to Duel" on Feb. 19:

Vineet Tiruvadi's article "Right to Duel" is an excellent satire with an equally excellent point. It appears that this is a follow-up to his previous article, "Guns of tomorrow, laws of today," which received a barrage of angry comments from conservatives disgruntled at the very suggestion of replacing lethal weapons with non-lethal ones. As a conservative, I am rather disturbed at the level of obsession others of a like mind have with the gun issue. Many gun-loving conservatives would say criminals, when breaking the law, are no longer worthy of protection, and we are "better off without them." While I believe that keeping a lawful society is honorable and absolutely necessary, it is important we don't lose our grasp with the seriousness and finality of death. The second amendment protects our right to self-defense, not our right to take the lives of criminals. So what is really the main idea behind our right to self-defense? Is it to prevent crime or our self-righteous obsession with killing criminals?
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools


Give us your take on the story.
Be sure to include your name, major, and class year. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.

By submitting a comment, you agree to thebatt.com's Terms of Use.

You may also send a Mail Call to The Battalion at mailcall@thebatt.com


Advertisement

In Today's Print

 

Just In (AP Lead Stories)

Advertisement

  • Podcasts
  • Videos