Issue date: 3/13/09 Section: Opinion

Media Credit: Gail Hernandez [Click to enlarge]

Well, they've done it again. Legislators in New Mexico have managed to waste valuable time and taxpayers' dollars saying something that amounts to nothing and which demonstrates a complete lack of concern for the independence of a field, while not being quite serious enough to offend.

As almost all of you probably don't know, today is the second anniversary of Pluto Planet Day. In March 2007, New Mexico's legislators declared the recently downgraded orb to be a planet, at least when it visits their state.

The resolution, known as a memorial, passed through both houses of the state legislature and declares that "as Pluto passes overhead through New Mexico's excellent night skies, it be declared a planet […]" The legislation even proclaimed March 13, 2007, Pluto Planet Day in honor of the birth of Pluto's discoverer, Percival Lowell.

All good and well, one might say. But this makes me wonder if these people really know what their job is. Apparently, passing old-fashioned laws has gotten to be old-fashioned. And if you think bestowing time-particular planethood is above and beyond the job description of a modern legislator, wait until you hear what kind of prerogatives the representatives in Washington, D.C., think they have.

Pluto Planet Day is a playful case, but more recent events have provided Americans with more weighty examples of people biting off a bit more than they know how to chew. From the dying auto industry to the banks to the ever-controversial field of federal interference in healthcare, people seem to look to "The Government" to solve whatever crisis comes their way. As if "The Government's" ability to tax and spend somehow makes it a responsible professional in every field imaginable.

The saying that "politics is show business for the ugly" seems to be applicable to more than one industry, if "The Government's" track record is any indication of performance.

Detroit is failing, so the Big Three need a bailout. Why? It might be that NAFTA reduced the cost of importing automobiles that were completely assembled by cheaper labor just a hop, skip and a jump across the Rio Grande. It might be that the federal government decided to allow non-unionized cars to be built by Toyota while American-made models suffered from no such generosity in Japan, or any number of comparable cases.

Continued...

Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools