Quantcast The Battalion
College Media Network
  • ©2010 Student Media

Judge delays red light camera takedown

By: Julie Rambin

Issue date: 11/12/09 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
The red light cameras in College Station are staying put for now.

A temporary restraining order issued Wednesday by 85th District Court Judge Suzanne Stovall prevents the city from turning off the cameras for at least nine more days.

The restraining order was issued in response to a lawsuit filed by former Keep College Station Safe attorney Roger Gordon, alleging that the wording of the red light camera petition rendered the election invalid.

"We respect Judge Stovall's decision to grant the plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order and will look to her for a decision about the validity of the Nov. 3 election results," said College Station City Manager Glenn Brown in a statement. "However, should the judge rule that the election is invalid and that the red-light cameras should stay, I will recommend to the College Station City Council that we immediately inform American Traffic Solutions that we are giving them the required 60-day notice that we are canceling our contract and the cameras will be turned off."

The resolution to cease red light camera enforcement passed by a margin of 272 votes, a 52 percent majority.

The red light camera controversy started in summer 2009, when a petition circulated by College Station resident Jim Ash and his political action committee Take Back Your City was signed by 964 registered College Station voters.

The city accepted Ash's petition and scheduled a special election on the issue.

The political action committee Keep College Station Safe was founded in response to the petition, and received funding principally from American Traffic Solutions and several Houston companies with contracts with American Traffic Solutions.

An ethics complaint against Ash was previously filed by Gordon on behalf of Keep College Station Safe, saying that Ash violated Texas election code by accepting and spending money for the campaign without appointing a treasurer for Take Back Your City.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools


Give us your take on the story.
Be sure to include your name, major, and class year. Submissions without this information are subject to deletion.

By submitting a comment, you agree to thebatt.com's Terms of Use.

You may also send a Mail Call to The Battalion at mailcall@thebatt.com


Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 9

Dave ;98

posted 11/12/09 @ 8:10 AM CST

I don't know how college station ever let them go up in the first place. I think they have their place. In case of accidents determing fault, but not for enforcemnt of trivial and minor infractions like running a red light. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Dan

posted 11/12/09 @ 9:20 AM CST

If we need to pay for more police to keep us safe, let's raise taxes on everyone, not just single out people who break the law and endanger people's lives. (Continued…)

Dustin

posted 11/12/09 @ 1:06 PM CST

It's truely sad that some people actually believe cops could do the same job as these cameras.

Take a guess on how many cops at every intersection 24/7 it would take to enforce the "no running a red light law", now add in the cost of keeping one cop at each intersection 24/7. (Continued…)

Matt '10

posted 11/12/09 @ 1:19 PM CST

Keep College Station Safe is a PAC formed by the company that operates the cameras. They are so sleazy.

Tall Bob

posted 11/12/09 @ 1:35 PM CST

It's good to know that the home of the Texas A&M University and George Bush Presidential Library doesn't give two shits about the democratic process. If we don't win by votes, why let's win with bullshit lawsuits. (Continued…)

Earle Stone

posted 11/13/09 @ 9:59 AM CST

47% of fees were collected when people turned legally right on red. As this is a fee and not a fine, there was no due process recourse. There was also an increase in the number of accidents where these lights were installed. (Continued…)

David Ball

posted 11/16/09 @ 10:05 AM CST

I was recently massacred in a custody battle for my now 6 year old daughter.

The following is a modification of what I posted on
http://www.courthouseforum. (Continued…)

David

posted 11/27/09 @ 9:11 PM CST

Good for this judge! Lets face it, like everything else government does, the stated purpose (which is usually benevolent sounding - i.e. feed the starving children, reduce traffic injuries) is almost never the real motivation behind creating some new "program" or implementing a new law. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

In Today's Print

 

Just In (AP Lead Stories)

Advertisement

  • Podcasts
  • Videos